Summary:

Closing arguments are expected Monday in the Daniel Penny trial.
Penny is charged with manslaughter and negligent homicide in the death of Jordan Neely.
The case centers around a subway chokehold incident and raises questions about self-defense, race, and mental illness.
Prosecutors argue Penny used excessive force, while the defense claims he acted in self-defense.
The jury will deliberate after closing arguments.

Subway Chokehold Trial: Closing Arguments Begin

The trial of Daniel Penny, charged with manslaughter and negligent homicide in the death of Jordan Neely, is reaching its conclusion. Closing arguments are expected on Monday.

The Case

Penny, a 25-year-old veteran, is accused of using a fatal chokehold on Neely, a 30-year-old homeless man, during a May 2023 incident on a New York City subway. The incident sparked a debate about self-defense, mental illness, and race.

Prosecutors argue that while Penny's intentions might have been to protect passengers from Neely's erratic behavior, he used excessive force, holding the chokehold for an extended period. The medical examiner testified that the chokehold caused Neely's death. Video evidence presented at trial showed Neely possessing a muffin but no weapon. The prosecution emphasized that deadly force is only justified when absolutely necessary.

The defense contends Penny acted in self-defense, responding to Neely's "unhinged rage." They questioned the autopsy's findings, suggesting contributing factors such as Neely's schizophrenia, drug use, and a blood condition. Penny did not testify, but his statements to police were played in court. The defense presented eyewitness testimony that passengers felt threatened by Neely.

Key Arguments

Prosecution: Penny used excessive and deadly force, exceeding what was necessary for self-defense.
Defense: Penny acted to protect himself and other passengers from a perceived threat.

Following closing arguments, the jury will deliberate on the verdict.

More Manhattan news

Source: ABC7 New York